Evaluasi Kebijakan Tarif Cukai Rokok Elektrik Guna Mendorong Persaingan Usaha Yang Sehat

Authors

  • Mukti Fajar ND Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v3i2.78

Keywords:

Competition, Tariff, Vape, Open Liquid, Closed Liquid, Persaingan, Cair Sistem Terbuka, Cair Sistem Tertutup

Abstract

The tariff on the open and closed liquid system of e-cigarettes has a significant gap. Both products have the same characteristics, with the main difference in the liquid-filling mechanism. The open system allows the user to fill in manually, while in the closed system the liquid and shells are just installed into the device. Even though they both contain the same substance, the tariff on the closed system (Rp. 6,030/ml) is 14 times higher than the open system (Rp. 445/ml). Therefore this study is focussing on aspects of tariff policy on e-cigarettes from the competition law. This research is directed to evaluate the e-cigarette tariff policy in competition law as an effort to strengthen the function and role of the government to promote fairness in competition. This research was conducted using a normative/doctrinal juridical method. The results of the study indicate that differences in tariff rates have caused polemics not only from a business standpoint but also from the role and function of the government as a regulator of fair business competition. Separation and differentiation of tariff rates on Open Systems and Closed Systems have led to unequal treatment in business competition. This policy is detrimental to the business actors because they have to pay a tariff rate 14 times higher than that of their competitors. Whereas in order to carry out its functions and roles, the government should act as the competition policy maker and as an advocate of competition. Thus the government as a regulator plays an important role to create responsive and fair policies for business competition.

References

BUKU

Amos, Amanda, et al., (2016), Nicotine Without Smoke: Tobacco Harm Reduction, London: Royal College of Physicians.

Andi Fahmi Lubis, Et.Al., (2009), Hukum Persaingan Usaha Antara Teks dan Konteks, Jakarta: KPPU.

Francis Fukuyama, (2004), The End of History and the Last of Man, trans. Amirullah: Kemenangan Kapitalisme dan Demokrasi Liberal, Yogyakarta: Qalam.

Johny Ibrahim, (2006), Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Filosofi, Teori, dan Implikasi Penerapannya di Indonesia), Cet. I, Malang: Penerbit Bayu Media.

Khalimi dan Moch. Iqbal, (2020), Hukum Pajak Teori dan Praktik, Lampung: Aura.

Mustafa Kamal Rokan, (2010), Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Teori Dan Praktiknya Di Indonesia), Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2005). Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana.

PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANG

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan;

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 109 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengamanan Bahan Yang Mengandung Zat Adiktif Berupa Produk Tembakau Bagi Kesehatan;

Peraturan Presiden Nomor 18 Tahun 2020 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2020–2024;

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 146/PMK.010/2017 tentang Tarif Cukai Hasil Tembakau;

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 156/PMK.010/2018 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 146/PMK.010/2017 tentang Tarif Cukai Hasil Tembakau;

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 152/PMK.010/2019 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 146/PMK.010/2017 tentang Tarif Cukai Hasil Tembakau;

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 198/PMK.010/2020 tentang Tarif Cukai Hasil Tembakau;

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia 193/PMK.010/2021 tentang Tarif Cukai Hasil Tembakau Berupa Rokok elektronik dan Hasil Pengolahan Tembakau Lainnya;

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 63/PMK.03/2022 tentang Pajak Pertambahan Nilai atas Penyerahan Hasil Tembakau.

JURNAL

Gallus, S., Lugo, A., Liu, X., Borroni, E., Clancy, L., Gorini, G., & TackSHS Project Investigators. (2022). Use And Awareness Of Heated Tobacco Products In Europe. Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 32, Issue (3), PP. 139-144.

Izzani, K. M., & Hermawan, D. (2021). The Value of Innovation in Tobacco Processing Products: An Evidence from Bandung E-Cigarette Industry. International Journal of Creative Business and Management, Volume 1, Issue (1), PP. 1-20.

Maria Bass et al., (2010), “Surface Structure of Nafion in Vapor and Liquid,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Volume 114, Number 11, PP. 84–90, DOI: 10.1021/jp9113128.

McNeill A., Brose L.S., Calder R., Bauld L. & Robson D., (2018), Evidence Review of E-Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Products 2018. A Report Commissioned By Public Health England. London: Public Health England.

Notley, C., Ward, E., Dawkins, L., & Holland, R. (2018). The Unique Contribution of E-cigarettes for Tobacco Harm Reduction in Supporting Smoking Relapse Prevention, Harm Reduction Journal, Volume 15, Issue (1).

Nuan Ping Cheah et al., (2014), Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: Regulatory and Safety Challenges: Singapore Perspective, Tobacco Control, Volume 23, Number 2, hlm. 119–125, DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050483.

Tattan-Birch H, Et. Al., (2022), Heated Tobacco Products For Smoking Cessation And Reducing Smoking Prevalence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2022, Issue 1. Art. Number: CD013790. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013790.pub2. Accessed 18 September 2022.

Y. Akiyama & N. Sherwood, (2021), Systematic Review of Biomarker Findings From Clinical Studies of Electronic Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Products, Toxicology Report, Volume 8, PP. 282-294

Yati Nurhayati, (2013), “Perdebatan Antara Metode Normatif Dengan Metode Empirik Dalam Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Ditinjau Dari Karakter, Fungsi, dan Tujuan Ilmu Hukum” Jurnal Al Adl, Volume 5, Nomor 10.

Yati Nurhayati, Ifrani, & M. Yasir Said, (2021), “Metodologi Normatif dan Empiris Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum”, Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, Volume 2, Nomor1, Februari 2021.

Znyk M., Jurewicz J., Kaleta D., (2021), Exposure to Heated Tobacco Products and Adverse Health Effects, a Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Volume 18, Issue (12), P.6651. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126651.

INTERNET

Anto Kurniawan, (2022), "Potensi Pasar Besar, Regulasi Masih Jadi Tantangan Industri Tembakau Alternatif", SINDOnews.com.

Dzulfiqar Fathur Rahman, (2022), “Penerimaan Cukai Hasil Tembakau Tumbuh 33% pada Semester I 2022”, Dalam Katadata, dapat diakses secara online pada https://databoks.katadata.co.id/

Lainnya

Candra Fajri Ananda, Koran SINDO, (2020), “Menelisik Masa Depan Industri dan Cukai Hasil Tembakau”.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-19

How to Cite

ND, M. F. (2022). Evaluasi Kebijakan Tarif Cukai Rokok Elektrik Guna Mendorong Persaingan Usaha Yang Sehat. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 3(2), 230-249. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v3i2.78